A tactical guide to running the Lorikeet sales motion: discovery-first, demo-driven, proactive qualification.
All Discovery, No Pitch
The first call is about them, not us. Your job is to qualify and understand—never pitch.
We have a bad habit of jumping to pitch a solution as soon as an opportunity is presented. The fix: ask one more round of questions than feels necessary before showing anything. Keep asking questions, shorten your talking patterns, and learn much more before pitching.
| Time | Activity | Goal |
|---|---|---|
| 0-5 | Warm-up & context | Build rapport, understand their role |
| 5-20 | Discovery questions | Uncover pain, stack, metrics, decision process |
| 20-25 | Summarize back | Confirm understanding, earn credibility |
| 25-30 | Schedule demo | Book next step before hanging up |
From tape reviews of excellent discovery calls:
| Adopt | Skip |
|---|---|
| More questions with more frequency | "Does that resonate with you?" — feels condescending |
| Clarifying questions on top of initial questions | "Could you see this solving PROBLEM for you?" — too sales-y |
| Anchor calls in logical business improvement | Generic tie-downs that competitors overuse |
Our alternative: "Does this look different to you than what you've seen from other vendors?" — acknowledges competitive market, pulls out differentiation.
"Based on what you've shared, I think there's a strong fit here. The best next step is to show you Lorikeet handling [specific problem they mentioned]. Can we get 45 minutes on the calendar this week for a demo?"
Always book the demo before ending the call. If they resist, that's qualification data.
Immediate Action & Feature Pitches from Questions
Use demo time to show the product working, not explain the product. Engage the main contact directly rather than presenting at them.
Demos are created ahead of time using /create-demo [Company] and sent to the prospect before the call. By demo day, they should already have:
Your job on the demo call is to show it working, not set it up.
| Time | Activity | Approach |
|---|---|---|
| 0-5 | Confirm priorities | "Last time you mentioned X, Y, Z. Still the top priorities?" |
| 5-30 | Show, don't tell | Navigate their sandbox, handle their scenarios |
| 30-40 | Feature pitches from questions | They ask → you show |
| 40-45 | Mutual action plan | Lock next steps |
Never present a roadmap of features. Instead:
| If... | Then... |
|---|---|
| We do it | "Let me show you" → demo it live |
| We're building it | "That's on our roadmap for Q[X]. Here's the adjacent capability today." |
| We don't do it | "We don't today. Let me understand why that's important to you." |
Never BS. Honesty builds trust faster than overpromising.
Your life will be much easier if you:
Ask Directly & Avoid 2nd Place
A deal exists in a superposition of won and lost until you measure it. Your job is to collapse the waveform—ask directly.
Be direct. Not manipulative, not scripted—just direct.
Second place = first loser. Tactics:
"If contract hasn't started legal review, you're minimum 30 days from signature."
Paper process (P) is consistently the weakest qualification point. Ask early:
Drive Testing & POC from the Selling Side
Don't wait for them to test—deliver a working sandbox, flood them with value, and make inaction feel like missing out.
A 60-day, multi-stakeholder engagement sequence that you control. Key principles:
Run /create-demo [Company] — generates:
| Day | Touch | Content |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | COO | Steve (CEO) sends personal note |
| 3 | Head of CX | ROI model delivery |
| 5 | CTO | Technical architecture doc |
| 7 | COO | Personalized video walkthrough |
| 10 | Head of CX | Competitive comparison doc |
| 14 | COO | Customer story (matched to industry) |
If you're wondering what to do to move a deal forward, pick from this list:
| Action | Points |
|---|---|
| Sandbox login | 10 |
| Ran a test | 15 |
| Email reply | 25 |
| Meeting booked | 50 |
| Document downloaded | 10 |
| Video watched (100%) | 15 |
Score > 100: Accelerate sequence, add CEO personal call
Score < 20 after 14 days: Switch primary contact or approach
Parallel Scorecard
Run two scorecards in parallel. MEDDPICC is about discovery—qualifying whether the opportunity is real. Proof Points are about persuasion—proving we can win it.
MEDDPICC answers: Is this a real opportunity? Goal: 8/8 before forecasting to commit.
| Code | Element | What to Find | Key Question |
|---|---|---|---|
| M | Metrics | Quantified outcomes | "What does success look like in numbers?" |
| E | Economic Buyer | Who signs the check | "Who has final budget authority?" |
| D1 | Decision Criteria | Tech + business reqs | "What are your must-haves vs. nice-to-haves?" |
| D2 | Decision Process | Steps, timeline, people | "Walk me through how you'll decide" |
| P | Paper Process | Legal, procurement | "What does contracting look like?" |
| I | Identify Pain | Problem confirmed | "What happens if you don't solve this?" |
| C1 | Champion | Internal advocate | "Who's going to fight for this internally?" |
| C2 | Competition | Who else they're evaluating | "Who else are you looking at?" |
| Status | Score | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Qualified | 8/8 | Move to evaluation criteria |
| Near-Qualified | 6-7/8 | Flag gaps, drive to close them |
| In Progress | <6/8 | Keep qualifying or DQ |
Proof Points answer: Can we win this? After MEDDPICC 8/8, prove we're the right choice. Goal: 5/5 before deal is "ready to close."
| Code | Criterion | What Must Be Proven | Proof Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| UC | Use Case | Can handle their use cases | Sandbox demo |
| INT | Integration | Integrates with their stack | Technical scoping doc |
| COM | Commercial | Pricing aligns with budget | ROI model + proposal |
| LEG | Legal/Compliance | Security/privacy requirements | SOC 2 + DPA |
| COMP | Competitive | Better than alternatives | Competitive doc |
| Green Lights | Red Flags |
|---|---|
| Champion actively sharing internally | Single-threaded to one contact |
| Economic buyer engaged in calls | No EB access after 3+ calls |
| Technical team positive after POC | "We'll test it internally" |
| Legal review in progress | Close date slipping without info |
INTRO CALL DEMO QUALIFY PROVE CLOSE
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Discovery only Show their sandbox MEDDPICC 8/8 5 Proof Points Ask directly
No pitch (already created) (Discovery) (Persuasion) Avoid 2nd place
Book demo Answer questions Economic buyer? UC proven? 30-day paper rule
by showing Champion real? Integration clear? Multi-thread
Immediate action Paper process? Commercial fit?
Legal done?
Competitive won?
Recurring patterns from deal reviews:
| Theme | Insight |
|---|---|
| Multi-threading | Go permissionlessly. Don't ask—schedule founder calls. |
| Founder activation | Jamie for CTOs (LLM credibility). Steve for CEOs (market vision). |
| First impressions | Wowing with speed of something crappy is bad. Quality first. |
| Pipeline hygiene | Deals dragging = signal. Brutally qualify. |
| 30-day rule | No legal review started = minimum 30 days out. |
| Ask one more question | Before pitching, ask one more round of discovery questions than feels necessary. |